THRESHOLDGIRL…..thoughts as I write Threshold Girl the ebook

August 5, 2010

A List for the Laurier Era in Canada (and earlier)

Filed under: advertising industry,crisco,laurier era children,Madmen — thresholdgirl @ 5:31 am

Girl’s boot from the 1899 Eaton’s catalogue on archive.org.

On an earlier blog I have a picture of what is supposed to be King Arthur’s round table, from a castle in Winchester, UK. I mention how Arthur pulled the sword from the stone, ie. iron from ore. It’s an iron age myth. (So Joseph Campbell says.)

Well, I want to do the same thing for the Laurier Era. I want to pull stories from the ‘store list’ Norman Nicholson left behind.

I’ve transcribed 12 months from 1895, when the Nicholson’s were a young family, when Flo, of Flo in the City, was two here: One Year’s Expenses. I have the entire list from 1883, when Norman and Margaret married, to 1921, two months before he died. He even managed to keep some kind of list in the 1908-1913 era, when he was away working on the railroad.

Like every family’s list of expenses, it is very repetitive. I had to write “Minister’s Stipend 40 cents,”52 times. And every once in a while 4 gallons Coal Oil, for that’s how they lit their home, until 1913, when they got electricity. And 1 llb (bushel) of flour, for about 4.75. Margaret baked A LOT.

And like every family’s list, every once in a while a ‘new item’ gets on the list, Keen’s mustard starts around 1895, or an unique purchase, like Kodak 5.00 in 1904.

Around 1900-1910, some of the most famous ‘brands’ of the 20th century, were being promoted in popular women’s magazines, Jello, Heinz beans, Quaker Oats, etc etc. (I’ve noticed that the brands that did advertise heavily, like Ivory Soap, were the brands that caught on…so advertising works.)

In fact, the very first item I pulled from the Nicholson trunk in 2003 was a Direct Mail advertisement for Crisco, from 1916. It was addressed to M. Nicholson, and I had no idea who she was! Margaret Nicholson. My gosh, I know her well, now.

I’m a former advertising writer, so I recognized the angle and style of the copy. Very polished and professional. In fact, I later learned it probably was written by a legendary woman advertiser, I forget her name, for J. Walter Thompson.

I guess way-back-when someone had the brainstorm that if you want to reach women in the home, you should use women copywriters. And then they realized that there was big money to be made working in advertising, so they fired all the women :) And now we have Madmen, in the 60′s, with the one woman struggling to get ahead. And me, in the 70′s, just out of school, being told at a job interview at an ad agency, that I would have to start as a receptionist and then move up to secretary, 2 years at least in each position. The woman who interviewed me was nuts, strung out and not inclined to be generous with career advice.

The ad in question is 6 by 11 flyer, in cardboard, folded in three with a fake letter on one side from a local merchant and cute Norman Rockwell style image of a child sneaking a bun off a plate. And one third of the flyer once contained a ‘coupon’ to bring to the grocer for a free sample.

MacRae Brothers
Pure Food Products (PURE was certainly the buzzword back then, for a good reason. That will be one episode of my series.)
Table Luxuries and Groceries
Richmond, Quebec, Canada

Dear Mrs. Nicholson,
Do you feel that breakfast seems incomplete without a hot bread of some sort? (I’ll answer for her: “NO, we’re Scots. We eat oatmeal. My grandmother lived to 99 on a diet of oatmeal…” Actually, Margaret was a great baker, as were all the Canadian Scots, I have read.)

Just break open a hot biscuit made with Crisco….Crisco costs half of what ordinary butter costs (war years!)…There’s no waste with Crisco, because it doesn’t turn rancid like lard….Hundreds of thousands of experienced bakers have adopted Crisco.”

Well, Margaret never did adopt Crisco, I have her 1917 butter bill. But my own mom did. I grew up eating cakes and muffins baked with Crisco. And the other day, I pulled out this old family recipe for my favorite cake in childhood, Chocolate Mint Dream, which called for Crisco, of course, so I had to go buy some. The cake turned out awful, I can’t bake, and I still have one block Crisco, which will stay in my cupboard until I throw it out. I use canola or olive oil for everything. Times change. I’m not alone: the baking section in the grocery is tiny now. But there’s a fresh sushi section and I think they are trying to genetically modify tilapia so that the fish has blueberries in its blood.

I wonder how I can format these Nicholson ‘store’ stories. I’ll try to imitate BBC radio four. They do great popular and social history.

And I might start at the bottom: one thing that struck me about 1885-86 was how much the family spent on buying shoes, boots and rubbers and getting the same mended. Even baby shoes seem very expensive, 1,00.

I guess, that’s the same for every middle class family. Kids’ feet grow.

The Paul Thompson book The Edwardians, that I am reading right now (on a Kindle) claims that poor Edwardian children went barefoot. No kidding.

Which accounts for my mother in law’s complete disdain for bare feet. She’s Marion Nicholson’s daughter and like most women born around 1920, who lived through the Depression, she thought going barefoot was a horrible thing. It meant you were poor! (And the next generation, born in 1950, when times were good, floors warm and Hippies part of the culture, liked bare feet.) I’m barefoot now. I seldom wear shoes in the house. And I’ll put a pair of socks on if my feet are cold, not slippers. My own mother, natch, had the same attitude towards going barefoot as my mother in law, but she tried to convince you that going barefoot deformed your feet or something.

July 27, 2010

The Not so Lightness of Being

Filed under: American Dreams,Madmen,the View — thresholdgirl @ 12:15 pm

Marion Nicholson, who according to her diary at 19 years, was 5 foot 2 and 130. Her weight went up and down in the 1908-1913, depending on the stress in her life. She was extremely thin in 1912, teaching her 50 ‘bad’ children in the inner city of Montreal. The Nicholsons were very self-conscious about appearance and conscious of their weight despite the fact that ‘plumper’ was still the fashion (the war would change all that). Well, it was the fashion among older women. According to the website fashion era, the silhouette of the dress slimmed down between 1908-1913, reflecting that younger women were working and were buying dresses. The Nicholson women never really had enough disposable income to purchase their dresses. They still made them, or had someone make them, their mom, usually.

Yesterday, I went an hour earlier to the gym, so instead of ‘reading’ THE VIEW off the television, I had to watch a very frightening show called Supermarket Sweep where fat people bid on the price of consumer goods, a la Price is Right, and then the winning family gets to run around stuffing their basket with junk food within a certain time-frame. (It’s a hybrid of a few popular shows, I guess and probably a re-run from years ago. It was on the games network) As I plowed away at my ‘walk through the forest’ program, I couldn’t help but think WHAT AN IRONY. And what a hideous show, promoting the very worst of consumer values… I thought, so typically AMERICAN. Then I saw that the show had been produced in Toronto.

At the least The View has very witty conversation. So what if, while exercising, I have to look at some impossibly beautiful and buff actress, when there’s no chance in Hell I’ll ever look like them (I’d have to go back in time for one). The other day, that redhead from Madmen (Christina Hendricks) was on and Whoopie and crew were praising her full 50′s figure. I thought, ‘as if it’s her fault. That woman could gain 100 pounds and it was all go on her boobs and hips in perfect proportion.

I started to watch a few episodes of Madmen, but couldn’t get into it. I know it is very good and expect to watch it all at once or dvd one day, maybe by that time it will be 3-d, or holograph. I was a copywriter, so I should relate. To the Elizabeth Moss character anyway. And I did, very much. Maybe that’s the problem, too.

And I love the 60′s. What I didn’t like about Madmen (the 10 or so episodes I saw) was the clicheness of it, or so I felt. It reminded me a bit of the show American Dreams, which starred a local girl, Vanessa Lengies. Beautifully wrought, but something we’ve all seen before

I just watched the Apartment. You see, all that wasn’t a cliche in the sixties or earlier seventies. It was a fresh view But it has become a cliche.

Even the beautiful secretary is a cliche, although I must say, when I worked in radio in the 1980s, the men went ga ga over all the sexier girls, playing one against the other. (One of the top men was notorious for going around groping and forcing fat kisses on all the women, no discrimination there. Except the old women would tell him to Bug Off. (He is now a broadcasting ‘legend’.) The usual. So cliches have their start in something.

In the 80′s a friend of mine was looking for her first job in advertising and after one particular interview she told me “I’m going to get this job: all the women staff are beautiful and well-dressed.”Well, she got the job to find out that all the women were ‘a harem’ to the boss. They’d all work late late late, but then, their social life was there. She got in trouble for wanting to leave at 5.pm.

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.