Miss Wiley under arrest, from a puzzle.
Who is this Miss Barbara Wiley, who took a tour of Canada in 1912, on behalf of Emmeline Pankhurt’s WSPU and who converted Edith Nicholson, my husband’s great aunt, to the cause of militantism?
She’s not a prominent Suffragette. Indeed, she doesn’t warrant a Wikipedia page.
But Edith Nicholson cut a report out of the November Witness upon her arrival in Montreal to give a speech for the Montreal Council of Women:
“Miss Barbara Wylie, the English suffragist, whose visit to Canada has aroused so much interest and speculation as to what it may eventually lead to, arrived at Place Viger Station at 3 o’clock yesterday afternoon, but looked so unlike one who had twice been in prison and was willing to fight again for ‘the cause’ that the small group of newspapermen waiting at the gate had a hard time finding her, and actually let her walk past. Miss Wylie (it turns out) is a tall really beautiful looking woman with every appearance of refinement and intelligence above the ordinary. She spoke intelligently of the suffrage movement, explaining the larger significance of the demand for votes for women and what she called ‘the absolutely unjust, cruel and disgraceful conduct and trickery of the Asquith government. She spoke as a highly intelligent woman burning with the conviction that her cause was right. She also showed plainly a spirit of resolute intention not to give up the fight for minute until the battle had been won.”
I have no proof Edith attended her speech, but since she attended the May 1913 speech of Mrs. Snowden, also promoted by the Montreal Council of Women, I assume she did. I certainly will make it so in my novel, or play, Flo in the City.
The Montreal Gazette gives a blow by blow account of Wiley’s speech. “The address given by Miss Barbara Wiley at the YMCA on Drummond Street (Why not the Women’s Y)under the auspices of the local council of women on the subject of women suffrage called up such unexpected warmth from the audience, for and against militant methods, that only the decision of the President, Mrs. D. Richie England, prevented the two parties from locking horns and deciding the question then and there.”
According to a brief bio I discovered, Wiley joined the Women’s Social and Political Union in 1909, worked in the Glasgow arm (this might have impressed Edith) and then came to Canada in 1912. She was injured protecting Pankhurst at a Glasgow rally in 1913 and arrested in front of His Majesty’s Theatre during a rally, at a function for the Czar with King and Queen attending.
According to another snippet I dug up, Pankhurst sent her to Canada to convert the Canadians to militantism, but it failed for the reasons I’ve blogged about earlier. This is because Wiley had a brother who was an MLA in Saskatchewan. She visited him at Christmas and gave some talks and met Nellie McClung, for McClung mentions her in her bio.
Barbara Wiley was very militant. Alluding to a ‘raid’ on Buckingham Palace she said this would encourage women to ‘cast off their chains.’
In the speech in Montreal she counselled women to go see Mr. Borden, but use all constitutional methods first. (She likely had to say this, or be deported.)
Wiley had already seen Mr. Borden earlier in the year in England. The suffragettes had met with him and asked him about the vote in Canada. From the reports in the paper he was quite, well, politician-like. He said it was a matter for the provinces to decide, as the Federal Government was bound by the constitution to conduct government as the provinces did. (Something like that.)
The Toronto arm of the WSPU put out a press release saying that they would not endorse her militant ways.
I wonder if Miss Wiley knew Gertrude Harding, the New Brunswick woman who went to England to join the Suffragettes.